Perhaps a better headline for this blog entry would be… “Provo Sells Its Residents Deeper into Financial Bondage in Order to Squander Millions of Their Hard-Earned Dollars on a Tax-Wasting Traffic-Congesting Slightly-Faster Bus Service That Barely Anyone Demanded.”
The Utah Transit Authority’s (UTA’s) new Utah Valley Express (UVX) bus line will finally begin operating on August 13th (Monday), nearly two decades after Utahn politicians first conceived it. This bus service is a form of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), which uses special buses (and bus stops) to convey riders at a somewhat-more-rapid pace than a standard bus could; it will transport its passengers back-and-forth along major Provo-Orem thoroughfares (both through Provo’s downtown and alongside Orem’s University Mall) between southwest Orem’s FrontRunner station (near Utah Valley University) and south Provo’s East Bay area (near Provo’s South Towne Centre mall).
This massive public-works project was joint-venture between federal and state and local politicians, who cooperated to compel hundreds-of-millions of U. S. taxpayers from Key West to Prudhoe Bay (although especially here in Utah) to spend over $200,000,000 altogether to reconstruct our local city streets to accommodate this new bus service, while leaving every Provo/Orem household burdened with repaying nearly $1,200 (plus interest) of added municipal debt. That’s a tremendous of money to pay, which might be alright if it were being used to construct a highly-demanded service that would greatly improve our local (or even national) quality-of-life.
So, what did we get in return for that massive financial investment, along with enduring all of the hassles of road-reconstruction over this last year? Well, it seems that (during its peak hours of operation) Provo residents can now wait up to 10 minutes (at most) to catch a fancy new bus that will transport them to their destination up to 10 minutes (at most) faster than driving. Yes, that’s what we got, which is arguably not much (if any) of an advantage! Moreover, this dubious advantage is only true as long as both one’s origin and one’s destination lie along the same select 10-mile-long strip of Provo-Orem city streets—which, for the vast majority of us, is a relatively rare occurrence.
The rarity of having both one’s origin and one’s destination confined to a single 10-mile-long path, plus the very-marginal improvements in transit-time that Bus Rapid Transit provides over standard bus service, together help to explain why the greatest demand for this BRT service has never come from UTA riders but from Utahn politicians. In fact, Provo’s city councilors have previously admitted that there is insufficient public demand to justify the UTA providing BRT service to Provo/Orem at this time—but, despite this fact, they chose to support the development of BRT anyway, while assuring us that public demand for BRT would increase as Utah County continues to grow rapidly. Although this claim may be true, it’s also arguably exaggerated, because nearly all Utah County growth is (so far) bypassing the Provo/Orem area to enlarge other nearby cities, especially those cities situated across Utah Lake that are not located anywhere near the UVX route—so, if we Provoans need to wait for ongoing local population growth to justify the existence of BRT, then we might need to wait for a very very VERY long time.
As an aside, it may be worth noting that demand for BRT is currently insufficient despite the fact that UTA fares are already heavily subsidized—in fact, according to a state audit in 2008, for every $1 that UTA riders paid in bus fare, Utah taxpayers were charged $4 to cover the rest, whether they liked it or not. Such forcible taking is not only sinful but criminal, as a matter of principle, whereas freely giving is a wonderful thing that’s good to freely encourage. In any case, considering the fact that standard UTA bus service has already been a severe money-pit for Utahns for years, it’s arguably reasonable to suspect that the UTA’s newly-built completely-subsidized insufficiently-demanded BRT service may prove to be an even bigger boondoggle for our city than its shoddy money-losing iProvo network was a decade ago. Such business ventures are arguably better deferred to actual entrepreneurs than to politicians who like to play entrepreneur.
If local demand for BRT is to grow significantly at all, then it will result less likely from any ongoing population growth than from Provo’s city council gradually achieving its “Vision 2030” and/or “Vision 2050” goals for our city. These documents are more than mere vision statements, but they have been actively guiding our city councilors in centrally-planning our city’s future, and they include various socialistic goals for Provo such as “sustainable development,” along with the closely-related concept of “Smart Growth” (or “New Urbanism”). Smart Growth involves allegedly saving our natural environment from urban sprawl by exercising political power to forcibly redirect a city’s economic development from its outskirts to its downtown, which then develops into a high-density urbanesque walkable core served by public transit. And this is precisely what both of these documents clearly envision for Provo’s future.
So, if Provo’s central planners continue to implement their collectivistic vision for our city, then we’ll likely see artificially-fewer suburban homes in west Provo and artificially-more urbanesque high-rises in downtown Provo. However, this probably isn’t exactly what will happen, because most people relocating to the Provo area who are faced with the disappointment of forgoing a Provo home for a Provo apartment will probably just bypass Provo altogether to go live in a nearby city like Vineyard—which is exactly what they have already been doing. Even so, Provo’s downtown population is still definitely growing, and its rising faction of quasi-urbanites will soon be able to enjoy a free cushy bus ride to either a mall or a FrontRunner station entirely at taxpayer expense.
Yes, I wrote entirely at taxpayer expense. Rides along the UVX route will not merely be subsidized by Utah taxpayers like rides on other UTA routes (as previously mentioned), but they will apparently be billed entirely to U. S. taxpayers for at least 3 years through a U. S. Department of Transportation grant. So, whenever riders step on those buses, they won’t pay a cent at their time-of-service, but they (along with hundreds-of-millions of other citizens from Honolulu to Bangor) will be billed for that bus ride in the form of federal taxes at some point, whether they like it or not. Which, again, is wrong—our political system should help us to defend our rights from others’ aggression, not compel us to pay each other’s bills.
It’s bad enough that we Provoans are being forced to both construct and maintain an insanely-expensive taxpayer-money-guzzling underdemanded bus service that hardly anyone wanted and the vast majority of us will rarely (if ever) use… but it’s even worse that this bus service seems well-designed to impede the flow of “normal” traffic around our city. Until now, this same UVX bus route was served by normal UTA buses that were simply one vehicle among many on our city streets, both using the same traffic lanes and obeying the same traffic signals as all other vehicles around them—but, now, these BRT buses will have their own special center lanes all to themselves, which are seemingly narrowing all other lanes around them while entirely eliminating at least some of the helpful left-turn lanes that Provoan drivers have been using. This may contribute to widespread traffic congestion while rendering it significantly harder for many of us to speedily get from one point to another—so, basically, hundreds of private car-drivers will arrive at their destinations slower, in order for dozens of public bus-riders will get to their destinations just a tiny bit faster, which doesn’t sound like a very worthwhile trade to me. Perhaps we should have expected this, though, because this is exactly what our city council envisioned in both Vision 2030 and Vision 2050—deliberately slowing the flow of private traffic while deliberately giving preference to public transportation. So, we can’t say that we weren’t warned—and in writing, to boot!
Just as our city councilors warned us about what they were planning, this blog entry should perhaps also warn us that, unless we start to choose our city’s public officers more wisely, then they’re going to keep doing more of the same. BRT is just one step among many their plans, and they’ve already informed us well about what other steps they’re planning to take. In fact, their vision statements have been surprisingly clear about the sort of socialistic dystopia that they seek for us—one in which they centrally-manage our city’s economy (and its development), regulate its Internet, redistribute its demographics, and even oversee our health and diet and exercise and recreation and such, all with relatively little respect for our rightful liberty. Perhaps they’ve been so surprisingly forthright about such plans because relatively few Provoans seem to notice (much less object) to what they’re doing enough to pose a serious threat to their goals. Please prove them wrong!
Perhaps the “bottom line” of this Free Provo blog entry is that, if you value preserving and/or restoring the relatively virtuous free society that helped Provo to develop over time into one of America’s best cities, then please get involved NOW to build support among your neighbors to elect better city officers next year. And, if you discover that our website helps you at all with that task, then please feel free to use it accordingly. Happy doorknocking!
- Salt Lake Tribune: “Audit: Utah Transit Authority heavily subsidized, less efficient than others in West” (2008 Jan 25)
- Provo Daily Herald: “Which Utah County cities are growing the fastest?” (2018 May 30)
- Salt Lake Tribune: “New Utah Valley Express previews future Wasatch Front transit: $1 million buses designed to act like trains in exclusive highway lanes” (2018 May 30)
- Provo Daily Herald: “Utah Valley Express drivers finishing training, ask motorists to watch the lights” (2018 Aug 01)
- Provo Daily Herald: “All invited to ride UVX route free thanks to government grant” (2018 Aug 08)
- Salt Lake Tribune: “Riding the new Provo-Orem bus rapid transit line will be free for three years, thanks to a federal grant” (2018 Aug 09)
- Provo: Provo City Vision 2030
- Provo: Provo City Vision 2050
- Provo: Bus Rapid Transit
- UTA: Utah Valley Express (UVX) Opening August 13
- Free Provo: Problems: Borrowing-and-Building: UTA Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
- Free Provo: Problems: Envisioning Statism: Manipulating Transportation
- Free Provo: Solutions
- Facebook: Free Provo
Sounds like a typical response from “Provoians” in the older generation. Many people as for myself are prepared for a future when Provo becomes a denser city. And a more efficient bus system is much needed around here. Utah is one of the highest-ranking states with the worst drivers in the nation. A dedicated bus lane away from the high traffic we get during rush hours, BYU football games is heaven. It’s about time that we make our city Public transportation friendly.
I agree with this article. The fact that UVU and BYU students will be given free passes for UVX as well as Frontrunner and Trax for the next 10 years (which the universities are paying pennies compared to the actual price) shows that Mayor Curtis knew the ridership wouldn’t be there. He also refused to factor in the free BYU Ryde buses that are often much more crowded than buses on the old 830 route. And now there’s this 3 year free pass for locals as well. They’re having to give passes away to try to get people to ride.
And Leo, it’s not just older Provo residents who think the BRT is a bad idea. Did anyone ever survey students to find out why they didn’t take the 830 bus? It’s the same route and the UVX will get its riders to the same destinations only a few minutes faster.
And I’m not sure where you’ve lived but do you have any facts to back up your blanket statement about Utah having the worst drivers in the nation?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so very much for your feedback!